Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-13 allowed

State of Uttar Pradesh vs Mahipal

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Two children aged 6 and 7 disappeared in January 2013 from Uttar Pradesh. They were the grandsons of a woman to whom their great-uncle Zoraver had bequeathed property, causing the accused (Zoraver's nephew) to harbour grievance. Ransom calls were made from a mobile number, and dead bodies were recovered from the accused's compound. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC for murder, but the High Court acquitted him, holding that killing the children would not have benefitted him. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the motive was revenge (not property gain), the SIM card and ransom calls were reliable evidence, and the accused's silence about bodies in his compound was damning. Conviction was restored but sentence reduced from death to life imprisonment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Kidnapping Ransom Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login