Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-20 allowed

Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

A Director of Technical Education rejected a sanction to prosecute two officers for alleged atrocities against an SC/ST employee. The employee then filed a false FIR against the Director. The Supreme Court held that the Atrocities Act cannot be misused for personal vengeance. While reaffirming the Act's protective purpose, the Court clarified that Section 18 (barring anticipatory bail) applies only when a prima facie case is made out; where allegations are patently false or mala fide, no arrest may be made without prior written permission from the appointing authority or SSP, with recorded reasons subject to Magistrate's scrutiny. A preliminary enquiry is required to filter frivolous complaints. The judgment balances protection of SC/ST communities with safeguards against false implications.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Human Rights Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act Bail and Anticipatory Bail Right to Life and Liberty Arrest and Detention Abuse of Process False Implication Protection of Witnesses and Vulnerable Persons Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login