Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-29 allowed

Sudam Kisan Gavane (D) thr. L.Rs. and Ors vs Manik Ananta Shikketod (D) by L.Rs. and Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be heard unless the High Court first identifies and formally frames the substantial questions of law involved, before hearing arguments. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred when it admitted the appeal without framing any question of law and then heard arguments and only formulated questions in its judgment. The Court emphasized that parties must know in advance which legal questions will be decided so they can properly assist the Court. The judgment was set aside and the case remanded to the High Court to frame substantial questions of law and rehear the parties before deciding the appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Second Appeal Substantial Question of Law Procedural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login