Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-25 allowed

Suman Jindal & Anr vs Adarsh Developers

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

The appellants booked a flat from the respondent developer for Rs 40,95,801 with an initial 25% booking amount. Through email correspondence in February 2008, the parties agreed to reduce the booking amount to 15%. After paying Rs 6,50,000 (exceeding the 15% requirement), the appellants sought execution of the sale agreement to facilitate bank loan disbursement. The developer refused and cancelled the allotment. The Supreme Court held that the 25% booking amount was validly reduced to 15% by agreement, and the developer's statutory duty to execute a written agreement before accepting advances was violated. The Court allowed the appeal, directing the appellants to pay the balance consideration plus 9% interest and directing the developer to execute the agreement and hand over possession.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Real Estate Law Contract Law Specific Performance Deficiency of Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login