Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-04-19 partly_allowed

Sunil Kumar Jain and others vs Sundaresh Bhatt and others

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether 272 employees and workmen of a shipbuilding company operating under insolvency resolution could claim wages for the CIRP period and provident/gratuity funds. The Court held that wages during CIRP qualify as CIRP costs with first priority under the IBC only if: (1) the company operated as a going concern during CIRP, and (2) employees actually worked. These facts must be adjudicated individually before the liquidator within twelve weeks. Provident fund, gratuity and pension amounts are excluded from liquidation assets and must be paid separately. The Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the liquidator to independently assess claims while preserving the Rs. 2.75 crore deposited for employee dues.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency Bankruptcy Workmen's Dues Employee Rights Corporate Resolution Liquidation Wages and Salaries

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login