Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-18 partly_allowed

Sunita Devi vs State of Bihar & Anr

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

A State challenged the High Court's order suspending the sentence of a convict convicted under Section 302 IPC (murder) and sentenced to life imprisonment or death. The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed to follow the mandatory procedural requirements under Section 389 CrPC. Before suspending or releasing such a sentence, the appellate court must first provide the Public Prosecutor a written opportunity to show cause, consider written objections if filed, and judiciously evaluate factors like offence gravity, criminal antecedents, and public confidence. Finding non-compliance, the Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted it for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Bail and Release Sentence Suspension Procedure and Natural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login