Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-04-11 allowed

Surendra Singh vs State of Rajasthan and Anr

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, C. T. Ravikumar

In Brief

On 28 November 2010, a group attacked Narendra Singh while he filled water from a hand-pump. The attack resulted in death. Five accused were named in the FIR, but only two were initially charge-sheeted. Later, the remaining three were added as accused. Due to their absconding, trials were separated. The trial court convicted Vijendra Singh under Section 302/149 IPC. The High Court acquitted him, reasoning that Section 149 IPC could not apply because the accused were tried separately. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that when five or more persons are specifically named in the FIR forming an unlawful assembly, even if tried separately, a member can be convicted under Section 149 IPC if the evidence establishes membership in the assembly and participation in the crime.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Unlawful Assembly Common Object Section 149 IPC Murder Criminal Procedure Evidence Trial Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login