Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-22 allowed

Suresh Ganpati Halvankar vs State of Maharashtra & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court addressed whether offences under Section 138 of the Electricity Act 1910—which penalises maliciously injuring electric meters—could be compounded alongside Section 135 offences (theft of electricity) under Section 152. The High Court had compounded only the Section 135 charge, refusing to compound Section 138 on the ground that it did not directly relate to theft. The Supreme Court held that Section 138 does relate to theft of electricity, albeit indirectly, and therefore falls within Section 152's scope. Reading 'an' as 'any' in Section 152, the Court concluded that any offence relating to theft of electricity is compoundable. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's judgment set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Electricity Act Theft of Electricity Compounding of Offences Interpretation of Statutes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login