Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-31 allowed

Sushil Sethi and another vs State of Arunachal Pradesh and others

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

The appellants, Managing Director and Director of a company (M/s SPML Infra Limited), were charged with cheating and criminal conspiracy for allegedly supplying sub-standard turbines to the government for a hydroelectric project. The High Court had refused to quash the proceedings. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the FIR and charge-sheet against the appellants, holding that: (1) no prima facie case of cheating exists as there were no allegations of fraudulent intent from the contract's inception; (2) the company was the principal accused but not arrayed as a party, and specific allegations of vicarious liability were absent; and (3) the project's successful operation and timely replacement of defective components contradicted criminal intent. The long 13-year delay between charge-sheet filing and service of summons constituted harassment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Cheating Criminal Conspiracy Quashing of FIR Vicarious Liability Contract Law Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login