Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-12-06 allowed

TARUN DHAMEJA vs SUNIL DHAMEJA & ANR

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar

In Brief

A legal representative of a deceased partner invoked an arbitration clause in a partnership deed to resolve disputes. The clause stated arbitration was "optional" and the arbitrator would be appointed "by partners with mutual consent." The High Court had rejected the petition, treating the clause as non-binding. The Supreme Court held that the arbitration clause must be read as a whole: while the first part clearly mandates arbitration of partnership disputes, the second part merely requires mutual consent for arbitrator appointment. When parties cannot agree, Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act empowers courts to appoint the arbitrator. The appeal was allowed and the petition treated as approved.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Partnership Law Arbitration Clause Interpretation Succession/Heirs Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login