Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-03-14 allowed

THE STATE OF GOA vs SUMMIT ONLINE TRADE

Bench: 2 — S. Ravindra Bhat, Dipankar Datta

In Brief

The State of Goa challenged the High Court of Sikkim's jurisdiction to entertain writ petitions against a Goa notification levying GST on lottery tickets at 14%. The petitioner company, based in Sikkim, sold lottery tickets in Goa and challenged the notification before the High Court of Sikkim. The Supreme Court held that the High Court of Sikkim lacked territorial jurisdiction because the cause of action (tax liability arising from business in Goa) did not arise within Sikkim's territory. The Court clarified that the material facts constituting the cause of action must be integral to the relief sought and must have a nexus with the subject matter. Mere location of a business's office in Sikkim does not confer jurisdiction. The appeals were allowed and Goa was deleted as a respondent; the petitioners were directed to approach the High Court of Bombay at Goa if they wished to challenge the notification.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Jurisdiction Writ Jurisdiction Goods and Services Tax Inter-State Matters Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login