Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-10-20

THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS vs M/S TIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS

Bench: 2 — S. Ravindra Bhat, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether state legislatures retained power to amend state VAT laws after the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 came into force. The Court held that Section 19 of the Amendment Act, read with Article 246A, expresses sovereign legislative power allowing states and Parliament to amend or repeal existing tax laws during a one-year transitional period. However, after July 1, 2017, when the GST regime commenced and Entry 54 of the State List substantially changed, state legislatures lost competence to amend VAT laws. Amendments to Telangana and Gujarat VAT Acts made after this date were void for lack of legislative competence. The Maharashtra amendment's pre-deposit requirement was similarly struck down. Retroactive amendments and curative legislation cannot restore competence lost by operation of the Constitution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Goods and Services Tax (GST) Taxation and Revenue Federalism Legislative Competence Constitutional Amendment Transitional Provisions Ordinance Value Added Tax (VAT) Retrospective Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login