Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-13 allowed

Union Public Service Commission vs M. Sathiya Priya and others

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

A police officer was not selected for Indian Police Service (IPS) promotion in 2008 despite being graded 'Good' by the Selection Committee. She challenged the decision before the Central Administrative Tribunal and High Court, which set aside the non-selection by reassessing her records. The Supreme Court allowed the Union Public Service Commission's appeal, holding that courts cannot sit in appellate review over an expert Selection Committee's merit-based assessment. The Court reaffirmed that Selection Committees have exclusive authority to classify officers independently of State Government gradings, and courts can interfere only on grounds of bias, malice, or arbitrariness—none of which were present here. The Court also clarified the correct period for Annual Confidential Reports in selection decisions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Law Administrative Law Recruitment and Selection All India Services Judicial Review Selection Committee Procedure Merit-based Selection Expert Bodies Deference Doctrine

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login