Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-13 allowed

Union Public Service Commission vs M. Sathiya Priya and others

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

The Union Public Service Commission appealed against CAT and High Court orders that directed the appointment of M. Sathiya Priya to the IPS. Priya, ranked 10th in seniority among State Police Service officers, was graded 'Good' by the Selection Committee in 2008 and not selected, as officers with higher grades were available. The CAT and High Court had reassessed her performance using different ACR periods and ordered her appointment. The Supreme Court held that the Regulations and Guidelines form a complete code for IPS selection. The Selection Committee's classification is an expert function not subject to appellate review except for bias, mala fides, or arbitrariness. The court found the Selection Committee acted rationally within statutory limits and no malice was established. The judgment of CAT and High Court was set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Constitutional Law Civil Service Recruitment Judicial Review Expert Bodies Union Public Service Commission All India Services

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login