Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-08 allowed

Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration and Ors vs Pradeep Kumar and Another

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of candidature of five candidates who had disclosed criminal prosecutions in their police constable recruitment applications. Although all candidates were acquitted by trial courts, the Screening Committee rejected them as unsuitable for police service. The Court held that acquittal in a criminal case does not automatically entitle appointment to a disciplined force like police. Where acquittal results from witnesses turning hostile or prosecution flaws rather than complete exoneration, the Screening Committee may properly reject the candidate. The Court emphasized that police officers must have impeccable character and integrity, and that the Screening Committee's decision is final unless proven mala fide. Courts cannot substitute their views for the Committee's judgment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Police Recruitment Criminal Procedure Employment Law Character and Integrity Acquittal Administrative Law Screening Committee Disciplined Force

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login