Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-02 allowed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Levis Strauss (India) Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 3 — S. Ravindra Bhat

In Brief

United India Insurance Co. Ltd issued a Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy to Levi Strauss covering warehouse stocks. When a fire occurred in 2008, Levi claimed Rs. 12.2 crores. The insurer repudiated the claim citing Condition No. 4, which excluded liability if risks were covered under a marine policy. Levi's parent company had a global marine policy (STP Policy) with Allianz covering worldwide inventory. The NCDRC allowed Levi's complaint, allowing a difference claim. The Supreme Court held that the STP Policy was a marine policy; Condition No. 4 therefore excluded the insurer's liability. Clause 47 applies only if law mandates domestic insurance; Section 25's prohibition against foreign insurance does not constitute such obligation. As Levi received substantial amounts from Allianz and insurance is a contract of indemnity, it could not recover more than actual loss or what it had already received. The appeal was allowed and Levi's complaint dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insurance Law Marine Insurance Double Insurance Fire Insurance Insurance Exclusions Consumer Protection Contract Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login