Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-10 allowed

Urmila Devi and Others vs Deity, Mandir Shree Chamunda Devi, Through Temple Commissioner and Others

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The plaintiff contracted to buy land from defendants for Rs. 90,000 in 1989, paid in full and took possession. Defendants later executed a gift deed to a third party to defeat the sale. The trial and appellate courts declared the gift deed void and granted specific performance. However, during the appeal, the land was compulsorily acquired. The High Court modified the decree to order only refund of Rs. 90,000. The Supreme Court held that under Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act, when performance becomes impossible through no fault of the plaintiff (here, land acquisition), the plaintiff is entitled to compensation from the land acquisition proceeds, not merely refund. The Court awarded the plaintiff Rs. 10 lakh from the acquired compensation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Specific Performance Contract Law Land Acquisition Property Rights Equitable Relief Damages and Compensation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login