Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-11 partly_allowed

Vedanta Ltd vs Shenzen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Indu Malhotra

In Brief

In this international commercial arbitration between an Indian power plant company and a Chinese contractor, the tribunal awarded compensation with a dual interest structure: 9% for 120 days, then 15% thereafter. The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, finding the 15% post-120-day rate unjustified and penal. The Court held that the rate coincided with the statutory challenge period under the Arbitration Act, potentially foreclosing legal remedies, and was economically excessive compared to international standards. The Court modified the award: 9% interest on INR components continues; EUR components attract LIBOR plus 3 percentage points from the award date, reflecting currency-specific commercial practice.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration International Commercial Arbitration Interest Award Enforcement Damages Termination of Contract

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login