Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-11 partly_allowed

Vedanta Ltd vs Shenzen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Indu Malhotra

In Brief

Vedanta Ltd contracted with a Chinese company to construct a co-generation power plant under four EPC contracts containing arbitration clauses governed by Indian law. After termination, disputes arose regarding interest payable on outstanding amounts. The arbitral tribunal awarded interest at 9% for 120 days post-award and 15% thereafter. Vedanta challenged the interest rate before the Supreme Court. The Court held that the 15% post-120-day rate was excessive, unjustified, and effectively penalized the statutory right to challenge awards under Section 34. The Court modified the award: maintaining 9% interest on INR components but changing EUR interest to LIBOR + 3 percentage points, reflecting contemporary international rates and currency-appropriate benchmarks."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration International Commercial Arbitration Award of Interest Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 31(7) Section 34 EPC Contracts Reasonableness of Award Proportionality Currency Mismatch LIBOR Statutory Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login