Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-09 partly_allowed

Vijay Kumar Rastogi vs Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

In a motor accident claim, the appellant was awarded Rs. 5,59,584/- by the Tribunal, which the High Court upheld but declined to enhance. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in not increasing the compensation when the appellant's taxable income, as per his Income Tax Return, was Rs. 77,480/- (after tax), substantially higher than the Tribunal's figure of Rs. 44,511/-. The Court ruled that loss of taxable earning, including commission and interest, must be considered. The appeal was allowed in part, enhancing compensation by Rs. 2,85,966/- towards loss of income and future income, plus 9% interest. The claim for car damage was rejected for lack of documentary proof.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Accident Claims Compensation Loss of Income Taxation Income Tax Returns Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login