Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-16 allowed

Vijay Pullarwar & Ors vs Shri Hanuman Deostan, a Public Trust through its Trustees

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

A public trust (Shri Hanuman Deosthan) sued to recover possession of a house from long-time occupants, claiming it was the trust's property. The trial court agreed; the district court reversed, finding the house was not listed in the trust's official register. The High Court set aside the district court's judgment and restored possession to the trust. The Supreme Court held that determining whether property belongs to a public trust is exclusively the Charity Commissioner's domain under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. The trust's registration clearly identified a different house as its property. The plaintiffs failed to produce documentary evidence linking the disputed house to the trust. The Court allowed the appeal, dismissed the suit, and upheld the first appellate court's decision.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Public Trusts Civil Procedure Possession of Property Title and Ownership Registration of Trusts Charity Commissioner Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login