Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-05-14 allowed

Vijaya Bank & Anr vs Prashant B Narnaware

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Joymalya Bagchi

In Brief

In this appeal, Vijaya Bank challenged the High Court's decision quashing a clause requiring an employee to pay Rs 2 lakh in liquidated damages for resigning before completing three years of service. The Supreme Court held that such restrictive covenants during employment do not constitute restraint of trade under the Indian Contract Act, as they operate during the subsistence of employment and do not restrict future employment. The Court found the clause not opposed to public policy, considering the public sector bank's need to compete in a deregulated market and the substantial recruitment costs from premature resignations. The quantum of damages was found reasonable and not disproportionate, allowing the bank's appeal and restoring the clause as valid and enforceable.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Employment Law Restraint of Trade Public Policy Liquidated Damages Standard Form Contracts Public Sector Undertakings Fundamental Rights Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login