Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-02 dismissed

VINOD VERMA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, K.M. Joseph

In Brief

Vinod Verma, a Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Telecommunications Engineering Service, challenged the redrawing of seniority lists by the Central Administrative Tribunal, which based seniority on date of joining rather than ROTA (Rotation of Vacancy) principles. The Supreme Court held that the Recruitment Rules, 1996, being silent on seniority determination, do not provide for ROTA (unlike the 1981 Rules). The date of joining is the correct criterion for seniority. A three-Judge Bench had already settled this controversy in BSNL v. S.K. Dubey (2014), holding that no promotion or seniority can be granted retrospectively when an employee has not been born in the cadre. The appeal was dismissed as the matter was covered by binding precedent."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Law Seniority Promotion Public Employment Constitutional Law Administrative Tribunals Service Rules Telecommunications Engineering Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login