Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-19 allowed

VITHALDAS JAGANNATH KHATRI (DEAD) THROUGH SMT. SHAKUNTALA ALIAS SUSHMA & ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT & ORS

Bench: 3 — R. F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

This appeal concerned whether a registered partition deed dated 31.01.1970 dividing a Hindu Undivided Family's agricultural land could be declared sham by the Collector under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, and ignored for calculating ceiling area. The Supreme Court held that the Collector's jurisdiction is limited to determining whether land falls within ceiling limits and whether transfers between 26.09.1970 and 02.10.1975 should be ignored. Partitions before the cut-off date cannot be ignored under Section 11 of the Act. Determining if a partition is sham is a Civil Court function, not the Collector's. The Court also held that the State's cross-objections affecting third parties were invalid as those parties were not made necessary parties. The appeal was allowed and the SDO's original order restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Law Agricultural Law Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Civil Procedure Partition of Property Hindu Law Jurisdiction of Revenue Authorities Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login