Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-11 partly_allowed

WAZIR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The Supreme Court determined compensation for approximately 1,500 acres of land acquired in 2002 for an industrial township near Delhi (phases II-IV), covering six villages with varying property valuations. While landholders sought enhancement based on developed plot allotments, the Court rejected such evidence as unreliable for valuing raw agricultural land. Using the base rate of Rs. 20 lakhs per acre established in an earlier 1994 acquisition (Pran Sukh), the Court applied 8% cumulative annual escalation to yield Rs. 37.54 lakhs per acre for two higher-value villages and Rs. 28.77 lakhs per acre for three lower-value villages. Lands on National Highway No.8 received 50% additional enhancement. Severance charges were denied, as the acquired land's development benefited rather than harmed the retained portion.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Market Value Assessment Property Law Administrative Law ONGC principles

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login