Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-08 allowed

Wild Life Warden vs Komarrikkal Elias

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified that an elephant tusk seized from unauthorized possession is Government property under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and can be confiscated regardless of whether it qualifies as 'forest produce' under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961. Section 39(1) of the 1972 Act expressly declares ivory to be Government property when an offence is committed. The High Court erred by focusing narrowly on the definition of forest produce rather than recognizing the statutory declaration of Government ownership. The appeal was allowed regarding confiscation of the tusk, though no recovery order was issued for the seized Jeep given the passage of time and lack of nexus to the offence."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Wildlife Protection Criminal Procedure Confiscation Forest Law Property Rights Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login