Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Tuesday, 04 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-04-24 dismissed

Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated to conduct advertising, marketing, and promotion for KFC and Pizza Hut franchisees, claimed tax exemption as a mutual concern under the doctrine of mutuality. The assessee argued that contributions from franchisees should not be taxable income because the fund was meant for mutual benefit. The Supreme Court held that the assessee failed to meet the three essential tests for mutuality: (1) Pepsi Foods Ltd., which was not a franchisee member, contributed but could not share in surplus, breaking the identity requirement; (2) YRIPL (parent company) had sole discretion to refuse contributions, violating the reciprocal obligation principle; and (3) franchisees had no enforceable right to surplus refunds, enabling YRIPL to derive indirect profits. The Court upheld the tax assessment of Rs. 44,44,002 as income taxable under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Income Tax Mutual Concern Doctrine of Mutuality Non-Profit Organizations Subsidiary Companies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login