Share on:
Access to justice remains a pressing concern in India. While the Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, and Article 39A directs the State to ensure legal aid so that economic disadvantage does not prevent citizens from enforcing rights, many people still struggle to afford basic legal costs such as lawyer fees, court charges, and documentation expenses. This financial barrier often makes litigation prohibitive, particularly for lower middle-income groups who fall outside the scope of state-funded legal aid.
Legal Expense Insurance (LEI) is a contractual insurance product designed to cover legal costs arising from disputes. Under an LEI policy, an individual pays a periodic premium in exchange for financial support toward legal advice, lawyer fees, court fees, and related costs in the event of eligible civil or employment disputes. This model is widely used in countries like Germany, the United Kingdom, and Canada, where it forms part of routine legal and risk management.
The core idea behind LEI is not to promote litigation but to remove cost deterrents that prevent people from asserting their rights. Early access to affordable legal advice can help resolve disputes before they escalate into full litigation. Even when disputes proceed to court, insured persons are better placed to pursue or defend claims without the fear of financial hardship. This can encourage early settlement, discourage frivolous claims, and enhance the overall quality of legal decision-making.
In India, LEI is not yet recognised as a distinct insurance category under the current regulatory framework, and there are no standard policy forms or underwriting norms specifically for legal cost coverage. As a result, insurers have been hesitant to innovate in this space. Regulatory clarity and guidelines from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) could stimulate the development of legal expense products tailored for Indian needs.
Professional concerns also arise due to ethical rules governing lawyers, such as restrictions on fee-sharing with non-lawyers and fears that insurers might intervene in litigation strategy or choice of counsel. However, international experience shows that safeguards can be built into insurance frameworks to protect lawyer autonomy and client interests. By limiting insurer involvement strictly to financing and preserving control over litigation decisions with the client and lawyer, these concerns can be addressed.
Legal Expense Insurance should not be seen as a substitute for state-funded legal aid but as a complementary mechanism that broadens access for those who do not qualify for free services yet struggle to afford private legal costs. Encouraging LEI through regulation, pilot programs, and employer-sponsored group schemes can help bridge India’s justice gap by making legal enforcement more affordable and predictable.