The Evolution of Right to Privacy: From K.S. Puttaswamy to Aadhaar

Share on:

The concept of Right to Privacy has undergone a significant evolution in India over the years, with its legal framework being shaped and defined through various landmark cases and legal interventions. The journey from the K.S. Puttaswamy case (2017) to the Aadhaar controversy has not only highlighted the complexities surrounding privacy but also tested the balance between individual rights and state powers. This article explores the evolution of the Right to Privacy in India, focusing on its path from the K.S. Puttaswamy judgment to its intersection with the Aadhaar project.

Right to Privacy in India: Introduction

The right to privacy, although not explicitly mentioned in the Indian Constitution, has been recognized as a fundamental right by the judiciary. It finds its roots in the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which states that "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law." However, its recognition and definition have been the subject of significant judicial developments.

While the Indian Constitution did not initially define the scope of privacy, it was in the 1962 case of Kharak Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh that the issue first came to the Supreme Court’s attention. However, the court ruled that the Constitution did not explicitly recognize a "right to privacy," creating a sense of ambiguity that would persist for decades.

K.S. Puttaswamy Case (2017): Landmark Judgment

The real turning point in the evolution of the Right to Privacy in India came with the K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India (2017) judgment. This case challenged the legality of the Aadhaar scheme, primarily arguing that the collection of biometric and demographic data by the state violated an individual’s right to privacy.

The Petitioner’s Argument

Retired Justice K.S. Puttaswamy, along with other petitioners, contended that Aadhaar, as a national identification system, violated their fundamental right to privacy. They argued that the collection of personal data, including fingerprints and iris scans, without proper consent, posed a threat to an individual’s autonomy and dignity. The petitioners also highlighted concerns related to the potential misuse of such data by the government or third parties.

The Supreme Court’s Opinion

In a historic judgment delivered on August 24, 2017, a 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Right to Privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This judgment overruled the previous decision in the Kharak Singh case (1962), where the right to privacy was not explicitly recognized.

Justice S.A. Bobde, in his ruling, noted that privacy is intrinsic to the notion of individual dignity and freedom, which is the cornerstone of a free society. He emphasized that privacy extends beyond mere data protection and includes areas such as family, home, and correspondence. This recognition of privacy as a fundamental right aligned India with international norms, particularly the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which acknowledges privacy as a basic human right.

Judgment’s Impact

The K.S. Puttaswamy judgment was monumental because it recognized the right to privacy as a constitutionally protected right. This judgment has since served as a reference point for all privacy-related debates and legal challenges in India. The ruling set a high bar for legislative and executive actions that affect personal data, requiring that any encroachment on privacy must pass the "reasonable restrictions" test laid down in Article 19(2) of the Constitution. The judgment also called for a robust legal framework to protect privacy, including comprehensive data protection laws to ensure the security and privacy of individual information.

The Aadhaar Project

The Aadhaar project, launched in 2009 by the UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India), aimed to provide a unique identity number to every Indian resident, with the goal of improving access to public services and welfare schemes. The Aadhaar number is linked to biometric data (fingerprints and iris scans) and demographic information, making it a comprehensive database of personal information.

The Aadhaar Case: A Clash Between Privacy and Welfare

The implementation of Aadhaar raised several privacy concerns, particularly regarding the potential surveillance and misuse of data. The core issue was whether the Aadhaar scheme violated the fundamental right to privacy.

A series of petitions were filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of Aadhaar. Petitioners argued that Aadhaar’s biometric data collection without consent was a violation of privacy. Additionally, there were concerns about the compulsory linking of Aadhaar to various services, such as bank accounts, mobile phones, and welfare benefits, which could lead to discrimination or exclusion of marginalized communities.

The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Aadhaar

In 2018, the Supreme Court passed its judgment in the Aadhaar case, where a 5-judge bench delivered a divided ruling. The court upheld the constitutionality of Aadhaar but also placed strict conditions on its use. The ruling made it clear that:

• Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for services such as bank accounts, mobile connections, or for private entities like schools and private companies.
• Aadhaar can only be used for government welfare schemes such as public distribution and direct benefit transfers (DBT), and that too, in a limited and controlled manner.
• Biometric data must be securely stored and not shared with third parties without explicit consent.
• Privacy safeguards must be built into the Aadhaar system to prevent its misuse, such as the establishment of an independent body to oversee the protection of personal data.

The Judgment’s Relevance to the Privacy Debate

While the court’s verdict was seen as a partial victory for privacy advocates, it also highlighted the tension between privacy and the government’s interest in promoting welfare. The Court’s reasoning reflected a delicate balancing act between the state’s need for data to provide services efficiently and the individual’s right to privacy.

Moreover, the ruling emphasized that Aadhaar could not be used as a tool for surveillance. This was crucial in addressing fears of mass surveillance through the collection of biometric data, which could be misused by the government or compromised in case of data breaches.

The Need for Comprehensive Data Protection Laws

The K.S. Puttaswamy case and the Aadhaar judgment both underscored the necessity for robust legal frameworks to protect personal data and privacy in the digital age. India’s data protection laws were long considered inadequate for the scale and scope of modern data processing, which spurred calls for legislative action.

The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019

In response to the growing concerns over privacy and data protection, the government introduced the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019. The bill is aimed at establishing a comprehensive legal framework for data protection, including:

• Consent-based data collection: Data must be collected with explicit consent from individuals.
• Data localization: Sensitive personal data must be stored within India’s borders.
• Right to be Forgotten: Individuals can request the deletion of their personal data.
• Data Protection Authority: An independent body to oversee compliance with data protection regulations.

Conclusion

The evolution of the Right to Privacy in India, from the K.S. Puttaswamy case to the Aadhaar controversy, marks a significant shift in how privacy is perceived and protected. While the right to privacy has been unequivocally established as a fundamental right, the ongoing debate around Aadhaar and data protection laws reveals the challenges of balancing individual freedoms with public policy objectives.

As India moves forward in the digital age, the need for a comprehensive and dynamic legal framework to protect privacy becomes even more critical. The recognition of the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right, coupled with the impending enactment of the Personal Data Protection Bill, is a positive step towards safeguarding individual freedoms in an increasingly interconnected world. However, the journey is far from over, and continued vigilance is necessary to ensure that privacy rights are respected and upheld in all spheres of life.