Workplace Sexual Harassment in India: POSH Compliance and Case Law Updates in 2025

Share on:

Introduction

Workplace harassment is not just a legal issue; it is about dignity, respect, and the right to feel safe while earning a livelihood. In India, the POSH Act, 2013, was meant to provide that shield, yet for years, compliance was reduced to paperwork. The year 2025 has changed the landscape. With stricter corporate disclosure rules, courts demanding proof of compliance, and new judgments clarifying what counts as a workplace, the message is clear: POSH is no longer a box-ticking exercise—it is a living responsibility. This article unpacks these changes, explains what organizations must do, and highlights the evolving role of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs).

Assume a young woman who works hard for her family, who has been feeling very uncomfortable in her work environment, finally gathers up the courage to file a complaint against her manager for making sexual comments to her. All she expects is Justice, confidentiality, and fairness. But what if the organization only has a POSH committee of paper and no functional body? Sadly, this is the reality of many workplaces in India.

The POSH is enacted after the landmark judgment of Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan, which laid down the guidelines for preventing women from sexual harassment in the workplace. It’s been 10 years since the guidelines, yet the guidelines remain superficial in many places. The HR body and the company management show the policy in papers, but fail to make a proper law or follow through with it. Now in 2025, the government and the judiciary have taken serious steps to ensure the POSH compliance in every work environment, not just on paper; there should be proper proof of training and committee, proof of action, and accountability.

The Posh Compliance 2025 - What has been updated?

From just one statement to full disclosure 

Until 2025, the companies just submitted a one-line report stating “The company has complied with the Posh Act.” 

But, in July 2025, the Companies (Accounts) Second Amendment Rules changed this completely. Now, companies must disclose:

• How many complaints were filed and resolved?
• How many are pending?
• What training and awareness sessions were held?
• Whether ICC recommendations were actually implemented.

This means the Board of Directors can no longer ignore. They must answer shareholders, regulators, and employees.

The Court needs proof and not promises 

The Supreme Court has directed the companies to submit tangible proof about the Posh compliances in their companies within 6 weeks of the timeframe. This includes the ICC details, training records, and the inquiries received. These days, compliance is about evidence and not assurance.

The ICC is more than just a committee

The Internal Complaint Committee (ICC) is a mandatory organ for the POSH Act. Many companies show ICC just on paper, but in real life, most of it is biased or inactive. In recent times, ICC is more than just a committee that exists on paper; it must truly function as a safe and fair forum. Any workplace with more than 10 employees must have an ICC.

A proper ICC must consist of

• A confidential complaint channel,
• Inquiry conducted within 90 days,
• Recommending a solution clearly and record-keeping, and
• Providing interim relief.

Organizations in 2025 are handling mock enquiries, giving refresher courses, and initiating external audits for the committee.

Case Laws that helped in the framework of 2025

1. In the case of Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa & Others, the Supreme Court required 6 weeks of compliance verification, which set a new standard at present. The employers must always keep a record and have to produce it whenever asked. 
2. What counts as a workplace is discussed in the case of Yogamaya M.G. v. Political Parties. In this case, according to the courts, political parties and certain informal organizations may not actually fall under the category of Workplace. But this raises a question of the safety of women doing freelancing and informal gigs. 

Human Impact on the effect

These changes are an effective way to reduce sexual harassment in the workplace. For a survivor, it is about knowing that the company is actually making changes and listening to her concerns, which builds trust and ensures the safety of many unheard stories. At the same time, the confidentiality and the transparent process help the accused and the victim ensure a fair hearing and interrogation. By this, everyone feels safe and can give their best at the workplace without the fear of retaliation or threat.

A checklist of the procedure for a company 

 Below are the recommended steps that a complainant can take, which are fair, just, and humane.

• The company with more than or equal to 10 employees must set up an ICC with a trained external member.
• Safe reporting channels must be created for receiving complaints.
• Every training log, report, and complaint must be documented.
• As per the rules of the board, an honest disclosure must be filed.
• Every now and then, ICC members and employees must be trained and updated.
• In the event of a complaint, interim relief must be provided during the time of the investigation.
• To ensure trust and effectiveness, an audit must be conducted annually and fairly.

Conclusion

A truly effective POSH framework goes beyond legal compliance; it is about building workplaces rooted in trust, fairness, and accountability. The reforms of 2025 mark a turning point by pushing organizations to move from lip service to genuine implementation, backed by proof, transparency, and functioning Internal Committees. When companies treat POSH not as a statutory burden but as a culture-building responsibility, employees, whether survivors or accused, gain the confidence that justice will be served fairly and confidentially. Ultimately, safer workplaces are not just good for compliance; they are essential for human dignity, organizational credibility, and the progress of a more equitable society.