'One of the Judges Isn't Well': SC Says it'll founded Bench to listen to Hijab Ban Pleas

Share on:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday, August 2, said it'd founded a bench to listen to a batch of pleas challenging the Karnataka supreme court verdict refusing to lift the ban on hijab in educational institutions of the state, and added one in every of the judges was unwell resulting in a delay.

A bench comprising justice N.V. Ramana and Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli took note of the submissions of senior lawyer Meenakshi Arora, appearing for one among the appellants.

“I will constitute a bench. one in all the judges isn't well,” the CJI said.

Arora said that the appeals were filed way back in March against the supreme court order and that they were yet to be listed for hearing.

“Wait. If the judges would are alright, the matter would have come,” CJI Ramana then said.

The top court on July 13 had agreed to listen to the petitions challenging the Karnataka court verdict on the difficulty. Lawyer Prashant Bhushan had then said that the ladies are losing out on studies and are facing difficulties.

There are several news reports on the hijab ban affecting or disrupting girls’ education within the state.

In June, the Uppinangady Government class College suspended 23 girl students who had staged a protest demanding permission to wear hijab inside classrooms. Recently, five Muslim girl students of the University College at Hampankatta in Mangaluru, which had also banned students from wearing hijab in classrooms, sought transfer certificates from the faculty administration so as to transfer to a distinct college.

The CJI had agreed to list the case the “next week.”

Prior to this, the appeals against the March 15 verdict of the supreme court, which had dismissed petitions seeking permission to wear hijab inside the classroom, were mentioned for urgent hearing on April 26 similarly.

Several petitions are filed within the apex court against the Karnataka tribunal verdict holding that wearing of hijab isn't an element of the essential religious practice which may be protected under Article 25 of the Constitution.

The judicature had dismissed the petitions filed by a piece of Muslim students from the govt Pre-University Girls College in Udupi, seeking permission to wear hijab inside the classroom.

“The prescription of faculty uniform is merely an affordable restriction, constitutionally permissible which the scholars cannot object to,” the state supreme court had said.

In one in every of the pleas filed within the top court, the petitioner said the judicature has “erred in creating a dichotomy of freedom of faith and freedom of conscience,” wherein the court has inferred that those that follow a faith cannot have the proper to conscience.

“The tribunal has did not note that the correct to wear hijab comes under the ambit of the correct to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. it's submitted that the liberty of conscience forms part of the proper to privacy,” it said.

The plea said the petitioner had approached the supreme court seeking redressal for the alleged violation of their fundamental rights against the regime order of February 5, 2022, issued under Sections 7 and 133 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

The state supreme court had maintained that the govt has the ability to issue impugned order dated February 5, 2022, and no case is formed out for its invalidation.

By the said order, the Karnataka government had banned wearing clothes that disturb equality, integrity, and public order in schools and colleges, which the Muslim girl students had challenged within the state supreme court.

Challenging the February 5 order of the govt, the petitioners had argued before the tribunal that wearing the Islamic headscarf was an innocent practice of religion and an important religious practice and not a mere display of spiritual jingoism.

The petitioners had also contended that the restriction violated the liberty of expression under Article 19(1)(A) and Article 21 coping with personal liberty.