Delhi High Court Pulls Up Centre Over Repeated Absence of Lawyers in Patent Matters

The Delhi High Court has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Central government over the repeated non-appearance of its counsel in patent-related cases, raising concerns about delays in the administration of justice.

Court Flags Serious Lapses
Justice Jyoti Singh noted that government lawyers have been frequently absent in matters involving the patent office, resulting in adjournments and stalled proceedings. The Court observed that such conduct disrupts the timely resolution of disputes, particularly in technical areas like intellectual property law.

Impact on Patent Litigants
The Bench highlighted that litigants, including patent applicants and rights holders, are bearing the brunt of these lapses. Cases that could otherwise be resolved efficiently are being prolonged due to the lack of representation from the government side.

Warning of Strict Action
Expressing concern over the recurring issue, the Court cautioned that it may proceed to hear matters ex parte if the situation does not improve. It also indicated that continued negligence could invite adverse judicial consequences.

Direction to the Government
The Court directed the Centre, represented by Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, to take corrective steps. These include reorganising the panel of counsel and ensuring that only adequately prepared and available lawyers are assigned to such cases.

Need for Administrative Reform
The observations underscore the need for better coordination and accountability within the system of government litigation. Efficient legal representation is crucial to avoid unnecessary delays and uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.

Discription: The Delhi High Court has criticised the Central government over repeated non-appearance of its lawyers in patent cases, causing delays in judicial proceedings. Justice Jyoti Singh observed that such lapses are leading to unnecessary adjournments and affecting litigants seeking timely relief in intellectual property matters. The Court warned that it may proceed ex parte if the issue continues and emphasised the need for accountability. It directed the Centre, represented by Chetan Sharma, to streamline its legal representation system and ensure competent counsel are present. The remarks highlight concerns about inefficiency in government litigation and its impact on the effective administration of justice.