NEW DELHI — The Delhi High Court has officially dismissed a challenge by the Delhi Police against the bail granted to former municipal councilor Ishrat Jahan. The ruling, delivered on Friday, marks a significant moment in the long-standing legal proceedings surrounding the February 2020 North-East Delhi riots.
The Division Bench, comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Ravinder Dudeja, noted that Jahan has been out on bail for over four years without a single report of violating the conditions set by the trial court.
The Prosecution's Challenge
The Delhi Police appeal sought to overturn a March 2022 order from a Special Court that originally granted Jahan relief. The prosecution's arguments focused on:
The Court’s Rationale
In upholding the bail, the High Court leaned heavily on the findings of the 2022 Special Court order. That original ruling observed that while Jahan was involved in protests, she was not part of the specific WhatsApp groups or organizations (such as the Jamia Coordination Committee) that allegedly orchestrated the "Chakka Jam" (road blockade) and subsequent violence.
"There is nothing on record to show that the respondent (Jahan) has misused the liberty of bail in any manner since her release in 2022," the Bench remarked during the proceedings.
Current Case Status
Ishrat Jahan was originally arrested in March 2020 under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), alongside charges of murder and rioting.
While her bail remains secure following this High Court decision, the underlying legal battle is far from over. In January 2024, the trial court officially framed charges against her, including attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy. The trial is currently ongoing, and Jahan remains required to appear for all scheduled hearings as the court examines the evidence on its merits.
Discription: The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal by the Delhi Police challenging the bail granted to Ishrat Jahan in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots conspiracy case. A Division Bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja noted that Jahan has remained on bail for over four years without violating any court-mandated conditions.
The prosecution argued that the trial court ignored evidence of a pre-planned, multi-layered conspiracy timed with a high-profile diplomatic visit. However, the High Court upheld the previous finding that Jahan was not part of the core incriminating organizations or WhatsApp groups involved in the violence. While this ruling secures her liberty during the proceedings, the trial continues following the framing of charges for rioting and conspiracy in early 2024.