Bengaluru, March 2026 — Actor Ranveer Singh has expressed willingness to issue an unconditional apology before the Karnataka High Court in connection with remarks made during a stage performance referencing a deity depicted in the film Kantara.
Background of the Case
The controversy stems from a performance at an international film event, where the actor allegedly imitated a ritual form associated with coastal Karnataka traditions, commonly referred to as Daiva or Bhoota Kola. During the act, certain remarks attributed to him were perceived as disrespectful to the deity representation, leading to public backlash.
Subsequently, a complaint was filed alleging that the statements hurt religious sentiments. The matter escalated into legal proceedings, prompting the actor to approach the High Court for relief.
Proceedings Before the Court
During earlier hearings, the High Court underscored the responsibility of public figures to exercise restraint, particularly when addressing matters of cultural and religious significance. The bench observed that celebrity status does not grant immunity from legal accountability.
At the same time, the Court granted interim protection to the actor, restraining authorities from taking coercive steps while the matter remains under consideration.
Actor’s Response
In the latest development, counsel appearing for Ranveer Singh informed the Court that the actor is prepared to:
This move is being viewed as an attempt to address concerns raised by complainants and demonstrate acknowledgment of the sensitivities involved.
Legal Significance
The case highlights the increasing judicial scrutiny over public expressions involving religious traditions. It also reflects the judiciary’s approach in balancing:
The matter is expected to be heard further as the Court considers the affidavit and the actor’s submissions.
Discription: Actor Ranveer Singh has approached the Karnataka High Court offering an unconditional apology in a case arising from remarks made during a performance referencing a deity depicted in Kantara. The controversy began after allegations that his imitation of a traditional ritual and related comments hurt religious sentiments, leading to the registration of a complaint. During proceedings, the Court emphasized that public figures must exercise caution in matters involving faith and culture, noting that celebrity status does not place anyone above the law. The actor has now expressed willingness to submit an affidavit of apology and undertake a visit to a धार्मिक site in Karnataka as a gesture of respect. The case underscores the legal balance between freedom of expression and protection of religious sentiments in India.