Advocate srinvasa babu d

I resigned from a private company in Hyderabad (I live in Khammam). My salary and full and final settlement have been unpaid for over a month, and HR keeps adding conditions like visiting the Hyderabad office. HR told me on a call that I could be replaced if I didn't relocate. The company has now sent a "final legal warning" email about a document from my joining,,it's was my mistake creating an document of experience because this company is stopped my wages and I got another offer and without money I cannot survive so, company asking for experience letter so I made it,and says it may take legal action. I want advice on (1) recovering my unpaid wages and (2) how to respond to this warning. I cannot afford high fees because my dues are unpaid, so I need free legal aid or a very low-cost lawyer, ideally one who handles employment and criminal matters. Please tell me the fee before I proceed. I'm in Khammam, Telangana.

Police filed a chargesheet against me under section 85 BNS,3,4 DPA. I asked for a chargesheet copy from police and they rejected it. I filed RTI and police rejected it. Court is yet to give CC number and list it. I need help in getting certified copy of chargesheet from the court. Case is filed in Eluru, Andhra Pradesh.

Sir, I need guidance regarding an existing theft FIR in Andhra Pradesh. My mother is the de facto complainant/victim. A theft of ₹2,50,000 occurred from our house in October 2024, and FIR Crime No. 589/2024 was registered at Nunna Police Station, Vijayawada. We have concerns that the FIR was initially recorded with weak information and an incorrect stolen amount Rs.2,30,000, which, in our view, did not properly reflect the circumstances of the complaint and may have benefited the suspected person. The suspected neighbour was not properly reflected in the initial FIR. Specific investigative leads repeatedly ignored The following matters have been repeatedly brought to the police's attention: 1. Eluru Prassana (Alias Andarju Venkateswaramma) and her son Andraju Durga Rao were present around the relevant circumstances of the incident and are persons whose conduct we have requested the police to examine. 2. We have reported that the suspect allegedly abused and threatened us and demanded that we withdraw the case. 3. After the theft, we identified financial activity of approximately ₹2.5 lakh, including gold-loan clearance. Explanations such as “rolled gold” and “cheeti money” were subsequently given. We requested verification through bank records rather than relying on verbal explanations. 4. We repeatedly requested examination of the suspect's bank transactions and CDR. We were informed that the DCP had directed examination of these records, but we have not received the outcome. 5. On 24-12-2025, the suspect participated in a saree-distribution programme at Vijayawada CP Office and gathered approximately 17 women from our neighbourhood and their details. We requested that the circumstances of her participation and her connection with police personnel be examined. 6. We also reported the incident where the suspect contacted a Nunna PS police officer at the CP Office entrance and, following communication with security personnel, was permitted to enter. We requested identification of the officer involved. 7. Recently, an indirect 50–50 settlement proposal was conveyed to us through local political contacts of suspect, including an offer to resolve the matter by returning only part of the disputed amount. We clearly rejected the proposal and stated that we would pursue lawful remedies. These circumstances, taken together, create a serious and reasonable suspicion that the suspect may have been using political/local influence and police connections to weaken or delay the investigation. We are not asking the authorities to accept this as a proven fact; we request that these circumstances be independently verified through official records, bank records, CDR and relevant witnesses. We are not claiming that these circumstances by themselves establish guilt. We want them to be independently verified by the investigating agency. For almost two years, we have approached the police and senior police authorities through numerous representations and PGRS complaints. Almost 22 PGRS complaints were closed, but we believe the specific investigative leads were not adequately examined. We also have concerns regarding the manner in which some PGRS complaints were closed. Senior police officers have subsequently given directions concerning further investigation, including verification of financial/loan records and call records, and there was also a direction concerning movement/review of the case diary. We have documents supporting these representations and directions. We have now reached a stage where we want to understand the appropriate judicial remedy. Could an advocate please guide us on the following: 1. Since an FIR already exists, can the de facto complainant approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS seeking proper/fair investigation or appropriate investigation directions? 2. What relief should specifically be requested when the grievance is inadequate/incomplete investigation of an existing FIR rather than refusal to register an FIR? 3. Is a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus for fair/proper investigation maintainable in these circumstances, or should the Section 175(3) BNSS remedy be pursued first? 4. We have very limited financial resources. We approached legal-services authorities/NALSA-related assistance but have not been able to obtain effective legal assistance. What options are available for a person who cannot afford private legal representation? We seek a lawful and impartial investigation in which the available financial, electronic, witness and circumstantial leads are independently verified and an appropriate final report is submitted according to law. Please guide us regarding the correct procedural route, the appropriate relief to request, and how we can proceed as a self-represented litigant if necessary.

My residential plot was under encroachment by a person. I have filled the suit against the encroachment. After 12 years I got the justice, decree came in my favour declaring me as the absolute owner of the plot. However on EC the names of the other party still appearing. I have approached Sub registrar Rajamundry, he told that he has not received any communication from court to registrar, so he can't take any action. I approached the court, he said as sub registrar is not a party of the suit, so court will not send any communication to Registrar. So my problem is what is the procedure to remove the names of the other party from EC . . Please suggest. Regards

Hi, Good Morning. I have received a **court notice** concerning a property dispute and a sale agreement. The Plaintiff has made certain allegations regarding the property transaction, which I believe are **false and factually incorrect**. I would like to seek your **legal guidance and assistance** in understanding the notice, reviewing the allegations, and determining the appropriate legal response and course of action. I would appreciate your support in this matter and guidance on the next steps, including the necessary documentation and legal proceedings. Thank you.

pentaiah is having 4 acres of land he is having 1 daughter and two sons during the time of 2010 he gifted 1 acre to his daughter and 3 acres equal share to his both sons his first son is having two daughters and his first son done partition his 1.5 acres into two equal half's for his two daughters now pentaiah daughter has any right on property of his brothers daughter