Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Monday, 12 October 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Home › BNS Sections › Section 22
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 In force since 1 July 2024

Section 22 BNS - Act of a person of unsound mind

भारतीय न्याय संहिता की धारा 22 के अनुसार विकृत मन वाले व्यक्ति का ऐसा कार्य अपराध नहीं है जिसकी प्रकृति या उसका गलत होना समझने में वह उस समय असमर्थ था। यह पुरानी IPC की धारा 84 है, बिना किसी बदलाव के।

Act
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Section
22 - Act of a person of unsound mind
Old provision
Section 84 IPC

Old law → Section 22 BNS

Corresponds toChangeRemarks
Section 84 IPC Renumbered, no change No change., IPS, Director, CAPT Bhopal

Section 22 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) contains the insanity defence - the general exception for an act of a person of unsound mind. It is the direct successor of the well-known Section 84 IPC, carried into the new code without change when the BNS came into force on 1 July 2024.

What Section 22 BNS provides

Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing:

  • the nature of the act; or
  • that what he is doing is either wrong or contrary to law.

It sits in the BNS chapter of general exceptions, which means it is not an offence but a defence: where it applies, the act is not an offence at all.

Legal insanity, not medical insanity

The section adopts the test derived from the historic M'Naghten rules, and courts apply it strictly. Three points matter in practice:

  • The crucial time is the moment of the act. A history of mental illness before or after is relevant evidence, but the incapacity must exist when the act was done.
  • Legal insanity is narrower than medical insanity. A diagnosis - depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy - does not by itself attract the section. What must be shown is that the unsoundness of mind made the person incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that it was wrong or contrary to law.
  • Conduct is the evidence. Courts look at the person's behaviour before, during and after the act - planning, concealment or flight tends to show awareness that the act was wrong; utterly irrational conduct supports the plea.

Who has to prove what

The prosecution must always prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. An accused who pleads this exception carries the burden of establishing it, but only on a preponderance of probabilities - the civil standard, not the criminal one. Following Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State of Gujarat (1964), even where the accused cannot fully establish the exception, evidence of mental condition that raises a reasonable doubt about the required guilty mind entitles the accused to an acquittal on general principles.

What happens when the plea succeeds

A successful plea results in an acquittal on the ground of unsoundness of mind - not a conviction with a lighter sentence. The court then deals with the person under the special procedure the BNSS provides for such acquittals, which can include safe custody and treatment rather than simple release. This is one reason the plea needs careful, informed handling.

What changed from Section 84 IPC

Nothing. The provision was renumbered from Section 84 IPC to Section 22 BNS with no change in wording, and the entire body of case law on Section 84 continues to apply.

Is mental illness part of your case - yours or a family member's? The insanity defence is technical, evidence-heavy and often misunderstood. Talk to a criminal lawyer in your city or browse advocates in the Free Law directory.

Have a legal problem? Ask a lawyer - free.
Post your question free of cost and advocates near you can respond. Or use Talk to a Lawyer option to instantly connect with an advocate.
Ask your question free →
Are you a lawyer?
Get listed free on the advocates directory. Search Supreme Court judgments with headnotes. Daily court updates and citizen queries from your city.
Join Free Law →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Section 22 BNS?

Section 22 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is the insanity defence: nothing is an offence done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, was incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law. It replaced Section 84 IPC on 1 July 2024.

What is Section 84 IPC called now?

Section 22 BNS. The provision was renumbered without any change in wording, so the case law on Section 84 IPC continues to apply.

Is a mental illness diagnosis alone enough for the defence?

No. Courts distinguish legal insanity from medical insanity: the accused must show that, at the moment of the act, unsoundness of mind made them incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law. A diagnosis by itself does not satisfy the test.

Who has to prove insanity in a criminal case?

The accused who pleads the exception must establish it, but only on a preponderance of probabilities - the civil standard. Per Dahyabhai Thakkar (1964), even a partial showing that raises reasonable doubt about the guilty mind entitles the accused to the benefit of doubt.

What happens if the Section 22 BNS plea succeeds?

The person is acquitted on the ground of unsoundness of mind. The court then follows the special procedure for such acquittals, which can involve safe custody and treatment rather than simple release.

What is the insanity defence under Section 22 BNS?

Section 22 BNS provides that an act is not an offence if done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it is wrong or contrary to law.

What happens when a plea under Section 22 BNS succeeds?

A successful plea leads to an acquittal on the ground of unsoundness of mind, after which the court deals with the person under BNSS procedures, which may involve safe custody and treatment.