Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-10-04 allowed

A. Ayyasamy vs A. Paramasivam & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri, D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Two brothers in partnership over a hotel business filed a civil suit claiming fraud and financial misappropriation by the appellant-partner. The appellant sought to invoke an arbitration clause in the partnership deed under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The lower courts rejected his application, relying on N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers to hold that serious fraud allegations render disputes non-arbitrable. The Supreme Court held that mere allegation of fraud cannot exclude a dispute from arbitration. Only allegations of serious, complex criminal fraud requiring extensive evidence, or fraud vitiating the arbitration clause itself, would justify refusing reference to arbitration. The appeals were allowed, and the parties were directed to arbitration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Fraud Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Arbitrability Partnership Disputes Judicial Discretion ADR

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login