Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-09-12 allowed

A. VALLIAMMAI vs K.P. MURALI AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — Sanjiv Khanna, Bela M. Trivedi

In Brief

A. Valliammai, owner of 11 acres of land, entered into an agreement to sell with K. Sriram in 1988 for Rs. 2,95,000 per acre, with Rs. 1,00,000 advance paid. Performance was to be by 26.11.1989. A. Valliammai later refused to perform, leading to correspondence in 1991 establishing her clear refusal. K. Sriram assigned his rights to K.P. Murali and S.P. Duraisamy, who sued for specific performance in 1995. The Supreme Court held the suit was barred by the three-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, 1963, as notice of refusal was given in 1991. However, exercising constitutional power under Article 142, the Court set aside the decree for specific performance and substituted a monetary decree of Rs. 50,00,000 with interest, recognizing K. Sriram's expenses and partial justice.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation Specific Performance Contract Law Real Property Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login