Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-03-19 allowed

A2: MANMOHAN KHANNA vs SUDHIR KHANNA & ORS

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Ahsanuddin Amanullah

In Brief

Two branches of a family descended from Tek Chand Khanna disputed ownership of two properties: Kamla Nagar and Malcha Marg. The Kamla Nagar property was purchased in the ancestor's name by Roop Kishore Khanna. After RKK died in 1978, his successors paid Rs. 55,000 to Attar Chand Khanna (RKK's brother) in 1979, allegedly settling ACK's joint family claim. The High Court rejected this settlement; the Supreme Court reversed it, finding the settlement genuine based on actual payment, witness admissions, and ACK's failure to claim any share thereafter. Malcha Marg, registered in ACK's wife's name, was held to be exclusively ACK's family's property, with no evidence of joint family funding.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Family Law Hindu Undivided Family Partition Title and Possession

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login