Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-05 allowed

Abdul Matin Mallick vs Subrata Bhattacharjee (Banerjee) and Ors

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

In this case, brothers sought to exercise pre-emption rights under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, when their sisters sold their share of family property to an outsider. The Supreme Court held that pre-emption applications require upfront deposit of the full sale consideration plus 10% with the application itself—this is a mandatory precondition, not optional. Since the pre-emptors failed to make this deposit initially and the High Court wrongly allowed them to deposit later, the Court allowed the appeals and dismissed the pre-emption application, quashing the orders of the lower courts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Laws Pre-emption Statutory Interpretation Civil Procedure Property Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login