Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-08 dismissed

Abdulrasakh vs K.P. Mohammed & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

The appellant, elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly from Koduvally constituency, challenged an election petition filed against him on grounds of corrupt practices under Section 123(4) of the Representation of People Act. The appellant argued the petition was time-barred because minor defects were cured after the 45-day limitation period. The Supreme Court held that since the petition was presented within the prescribed period, and court-ordered corrections of minor defects did not breach the threshold requirements, the petition was not barred by limitation. The Court also held that non-supply of sealed materials, where transcripts and CDs were provided, did not prejudice the appellant's defence. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Election Law Representation of People Act Election Petitions Procedural Compliance Limitation Corrupt Practices

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login