Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-24 partly_allowed

Ajar Enterprises Private Limited vs Satyanarayan Somani and Ors

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Ajar Enterprises acquired leasehold rights to a large tract of land (43,407 sq m) from a liquidated public sector company and sought renewal and conversion to freehold. The High Court cancelled these transactions, finding that the land development authority had breached public trust by renewing the lease and converting it to freehold without competitive bidding, contrary to public interest. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision, holding that although the original lease contained a renewal clause, the authority retained discretion to refuse renewal based on public interest considerations. The land was originally allotted for a public purpose (residential colony for employees), not commercial development. The Court confirmed the High Court's directions to recover the land and reauction it, while protecting registered plot purchasers with deeds executed before judgment and requiring refunds with 9% interest for others.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Land Law Public Interest Litigation Urban Land Ceiling Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login