Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-17 dismissed

AJAY RAJ SHETTY vs DIRECTOR AND ANR

Bench: 2 — Sudhanshu Dhulia, Ahsanuddin Amanullah

In Brief

A former employee of M/s Electriex (India) Limited was convicted under Section 85(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 for failing to deposit ESI contributions (Rs. 8,26,696) that were deducted from employees' salaries to the ESIC during February-December 2010. Though claiming to be merely a 'Technical Coordinator', the Supreme Court upheld his conviction and six-month imprisonment plus Rs. 5,000 fine. The Court held that under the Act's broad definition, a 'principal employer' includes anyone responsible for supervision and control—designation is immaterial. As the appellant exercised actual control, non-remittance of deducted contributions constituted a serious offence. The sick industry status offered no criminal exemption, only potential civil relief grounds.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Employees' State Insurance Criminal Law Statutory Offences Insolvency and Sick Industries Sentencing Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login