Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-08 allowed

Alok Kumar Verma vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

On 23 October 2018, the Central Vigilance Commission divested CBI Director Alok Kumar Verma of his powers and functions pending investigation of corruption allegations. The Court held that this action was unconstitutional. Interpreting the DSPE Act, 1946 in light of legislative intent to insulate the CBI from external interference, the Court ruled that any divestment of the Director's powers requires prior consent of the Selection Committee under Section 4A. The narrow interpretation urged by the government—limiting 'transfer' to a change of post—would be self-defeating and allow circumvention of protective safeguards. The Court set aside the three orders divesting the Director and directed the Committee to reconsider the matter within one week.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Separation of Powers Institutional Independence Central Bureau of Investigation Central Vigilance Commission Rule of Law Anti-Corruption

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login