Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-17 partly_allowed

Amar Chand vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of drug possession (20 grams Opium and 60 grams Charas) under Sections 17(b) and 20(A) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to two years and six months respectively. The High Court upheld the conviction. The Supreme Court held that 20 grams of Opium constitutes a small quantity falling under Section 17(a), not 17(b). The Court reduced the Section 17(a) sentence to six months (the maximum then applicable), maintained the Section 20(b)(ii)(A) conviction and sentence, upheld all fines, and directed both sentences to run concurrently.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Drug Possession Sentencing Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login