Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-28 allowed

AMAR NATH vs GIAN CHAND AND ANR

Bench: 2 — K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

In Brief

The plaintiff-owner executed a special power of attorney to a deed writer (second defendant) to sell his land for Rs. 55,000, but claimed to have cancelled it on 2 February 1987 after the intended buyer (first defendant) failed to arrange funds. The deed writer nonetheless executed a sale deed for Rs. 30,000 and registered it. The trial court rejected the plaintiff's claim of cancellation and granted only a rendition of accounts. The High Court reversed this, declaring the sale void. The Supreme Court allowed the first defendant's appeal, holding that: (1) the production of the original power of attorney was unnecessary for valid registration; (2) oral or informal cancellation without proper notice to third parties could not invalidate a subsequently executed sale deed; and (3) the plaintiff's own correspondence contradicted his claim of prior cancellation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Registration Act Power of Attorney Contract Act Agency Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Document Execution Sale Deed Land Transfer

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login