Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-12 disposed

Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur

Bench: 2 — Badarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified that the six-month waiting period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for mutual consent divorce is discretionary, not mandatory. In a case where spouses had lived separately for over eight years and reached a comprehensive settlement covering alimony of Rs 2.75 crores and child custody, the Court held that discretionary waiver is permissible where reconciliation is impossible and all settlement terms are agreed. The Court rejected using Article 142 to waive statutory periods but established clear criteria for courts to exercise discretion when granting waiver applications.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Law Divorce Hindu Marriage Act Statutory Interpretation Discretion of Court Mutual Consent Divorce Constitutional Law Article 142

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login