Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-05 partly_allowed

Ambi Ram vs State of Uttarakhand

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A public servant convicted of corruption in 1991 for accepting a bribe of Rs. 1200 to shield someone from arrest appealed against his sentence. The High Court had reduced his jail term to one year concurrent on both charges. The Supreme Court held that special reasons justify further reduction of sentence under the Prevention of Corruption Act's proviso, given the appellant's age (78 years), health conditions, 34-year delay in proceedings, minimal time already served (1 month 10 days), and bribe amount. The Court reduced jail time to time already served and increased the fine from Rs. 3000 to Rs. 10,000, allowing the appellant to avoid further imprisonment if the enhanced fine is paid within three months."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Corruption Sentencing Criminal Procedure Prevention of Corruption Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login