Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-04 allowed

ANKIT ASHOK JALAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

Ankit Ashok Jalan and Amit Jalan challenged detention orders issued by a Joint Secretary under the COFEPOSA Act 1974. The detainees had made representations requesting revocation, but the detaining authority deferred consideration pending the Advisory Board's opinion. The Supreme Court held (majority) that a specially empowered officer must consider representations independently and expeditiously, without waiting for the Advisory Board report. The 48-day delay in considering the representation constituted an undue infringement of constitutional rights under Article 22(5). The Court found the detention unconstitutional and quashed the orders, directing immediate release of the detainees. One judge dissented, finding that deferring consideration pending the Advisory Board's decision was reasonable, particularly where the Board comprises High Court judges.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Preventive Detention Constitutional Law Fundamental Rights Article 22 Representation Against Detention Advisory Board Smuggling Foreign Exchange Procedure Due Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login