Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-09 partly_allowed

ANU BHANVARA ETC vs IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

In Brief

Two young claimants suffered permanent disabilities (amputations) as gratuitous passengers in an insured goods vehicle involved in a motor accident. The High Court awarded compensation but made the vehicle owner and driver liable, exonerating the insurer because the vehicle was insured as a goods vehicle and claimants were gratuitous passengers. The Supreme Court upheld the compensation quantum but invoked the 'pay and recover' principle, making the insurer primarily liable to pay the claimants, with the right to recover from the owner and driver. The unusual circumstance—young claimants with permanent disabilities—justified this departure from standard goods vehicle insurance rules.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Insurance Law Motor Accidents Claims Compensation Personal Injury Goods Vehicle Gratuitous Passenger

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login